Girls with big tits have a trying time finding clothing that fits, bikinis doubly so. Our venerable site admin Vix, for example, is preparing for our Summer holiday in the ‘States and needs a bikini for the lovely hot tub at our cabin. Trouble is, she’s an F-cup up top but has virtually no ass (in her estimation, although I quite like it), so matched sets are out of the question. The only remaining option is to buy separates, which is decidedly more expensive.
So, if she has a problem, try to imagine what L-cup Rachel Aldana goes through! Well, lucky for big breast lovers like ourselves, we don’t have to imagine at all, since PinUpFiles has just released Rachel’s most recent bikini video. However, the bikini in question leaves little to the imagination since her huge natural breasts just spill out the sides, nipples and all, when she lies down on her back for some sunbathing (although I must admit the tiny bikini top does make for some lovely sidewinder shots when she’s standing!).
The obvious solution, of course, is to go topless, which is precisely what Rachel does throughout the second half of this video, sensibly slathering her massive breasts in suntan lotion beforehand (wouldn’t want those ample assets to get damaged, now, do we?). And so, here’s 34L Rachel Aldana in her tiny bikini & nude sunbathing videos from PinUpFiles.com:
I know it must be hard and all, but is she getting nicer every day or what?
I just don’t see her enjoyment of modeling. I don’t know if its cause of her age or … ? Maybe she’s modeling to get money for a reduction one day!? wow, wouldn’t that be a slap in the face
Ahhh… perfection. Total, complete perfection.
I have to agree with Tony. As drop dead gorgeous as she is, I still think her clips are kind of dull. She doesn’t seem to like what she’s doing, there just doesn’t seem like there’s anyone in there. But, I also agree with Vadd, she is just freaking perfect, as far as her looks go.
I agree with tony, her modeling is plain boring. does’t have any flair or passion about it, i usualy find myself going to sleep when i see her. she has a nice rack but seems dull to me. prefer models like Sam and Gianna, i would love to meet both of them. They seem to have a great personality.
Id just like to throw this out there about pinupfiles/glam. You mention that their videos are 852×480 HD resolution. Unfortunately thats not actually HD. According to the site admin of those sites, they record it in HD (which starts at 720, anything at 480 is standard def.) and simply resize them down to HD.
They claim that these are HD because they were recorded originally with HD.
However this is the same process they use for most DVD movies and you are in fact losing the HD quality when you down sample. Personally, this caused me to stop my subscription with any pinupglam/files website.
Sorry typo in my last post, it should read “According to the site admin of those sites, they record it in HD (which starts at 720, anything at 480 is standard def.) and simply resize them down from HD” not “them down to HD”
I guess the question is: what is more important? Perceived personality or how hot a girl is? For me, I go with hot. I think the main reason Rachels videos are boring is that they are trying to serve double duty by making it a photo shoot first, and a video shoot on top of it. Sure, she is not as enthusiastic or outgoing as many of the other big tit babes we all love but her pure beauty, as well as possibly the best breasts in the world, surpass that. I am not dating her. Or having a conversation with her. I am oogling her on the internet. So for that purpose, she surpasses all others. Just a perfect woman.
Another thing to note is that she is very young and new to all of this. I am sure that if she continues, she will get more comfortable in front of the camera (both still and video) and come alive. But really, as long as there are pictures and videos of her naked I am more than happy with that. Her pure beauty and hotness make up for anything lacking on the performance side- and there are not a lot of girls you can say that about!
She’s probably thinking about her mother reviewing her work; in the back of her mind or something along those lines. Or yeah, she probably thinks she needs to pull double duty for the pic part of it. Which exploits her inexperience to the business and or maybe she hasn’t found her sensual side yet also. This is all helpful criticism btw if you are reading this.
Vadd,
I was going to make a comment but I have no need now because you just said everything I was going to say in exactly the same order! I concur.
What Sam said. Which means: what Vadd said.
To me, she simply has the most amazing breasts that I’ve ever seen. Like has been mentionned, absolute and total perfection!
Greetings all!
To what Tony and the rest of the gentlemen on this thread said so far seems very likely indeed of which all of Rachel’s videos and pictorials are lacking any enjoyment of her sessions. Her facial expressions are along the lines of “Ho-hum! Another day at the salt mines! Let’s hurry up and get this over and done with!” I believe Rachel is in it for the money and nothing more. I don’t know the clauses of her contract but I imagine it said something along the lines of having mandated to show nipples up to DD-MM-YYYY date. Yes, the photographer is being cheap & trying to save money by pulling double duty photo op sessions for both video and stills, as many other models on the Pinup Files/Pinup Glam sites have demonstrated. In my opinion, I don’t think she’d reduce the mams just yet. I think she’s gonna (pardon the pun) milk it for all it’s worth and try to set her own future and her family up financially first, or possibly she’s being directed to do so by her Mom.
Which brings us to this subtopic: I read a prior sentence mentioning something of her Mother possibly reviewing/critiquing Rachel’s end products. God, I hope not! Talk about tremendous pressure and stress of being “pimped out” by her Mom for financial gain. This may be another case of parents controlling their star child. Careful! Rachel may rebel and “divorce” her family if she snaps, like some of the Hollywood child stars have done in the past claiming to have her earnings unfairly garnished or exploited and even squandered!
I read and viewed in videos that Rachel’s Mom had large breasts too. Why didn’t she consider topless posing in her youth, rather than attempting to live her dreams through Rachel?
Another question is that if Rachel is doing rapid-fire photo op sessions and earning a substantial sum of money, is she still working as a beautician/hair dresser or has she quit that job due to lack of time to what may be perceived as a busy schedule?
I also foresee that she may follow same footsteps of Ms. Miriam Gonzalez of Playboy fame. Miriam used to show nips in Playboy shoots but I have never seen any nips while under contract of Pinup Files’/Pinup Glam’s jurisdiction and control of her latest shoots. I’d like to see Miriam’s nips now because I believe her mams are exponentially much larger than when she was with Playboy.
Finally, what really irks me is that I have noticed that when presented with a chance, these models quickly grab a towel or whatever article of clothing to cover up during intermissions/breaks. What the hell for? They are covering up what everybody involved in the shoot has ALREADY SEEN! How prissy that appears by doing nude or topless photo and video sessions but covering up as quickly as possible as if they are “good girls” with some reputation to protect. Maybe I am dense and just don’t get the way how these women think but in my opinion, doesn’t that equate hypocritical behavior? I do but then again I don’t? I better don my Kevlar ballistics vest and my Nomex fire suit for any possible flaming aimed at my general direction! I invite suggestions and opposing points of view, so fire away.
Later, gents.
FrankNZ,
Very Funny!!! LOL
If only she would train her bum to get nice and firm, then it would be perfection achieved, apart from that tattoo that is. It looks like some sign on the side of a brothel. I really don’t understand why hot chicks degrade their bodies with that kind of sh’t.
I personally like the neutral way of posing. It leaves the viewer room for imagination. A little reluctance in a girl never turned me off either. It makes me feel more excited when she does deliver. And guys, please don’t call her dull. We all know that behind that layer of timidity there is a cum craving “offcourse you can fuck my mouth possessivly grabbing my tits” little slut. See, there I go!
Lenny – “Busy schedule”
LOL
Dear diary, woke up this morning. Had some photos taken. Damn I am sooooooo busy.
Regarding her lack of enthusiasm, I don’t see this as a turnoff at all.
She never asked to have the body she’s been gifted with by mother nature. But the fact is that she’s young, gorgeous, and she’s got people willing to give her money to show off her breasts. She’s probably not too enthusiastic about the notion of so many random strangers watching those pictures on the internet, yet at the same time, she probably realizes that it would be foolish not to take advantage of her looks and the money it can give her.
But that’s a very cerebral decision to make, and it’s perfectly understandable that her heart isn’t into it. ;)
Judging from the interviews I’ve seen of her, she seems more like a shy, introverted person, who’s somewhat uncomfortable with all the attention she’s getting. Which, personally, I find even more appealing. :)
Hi, I’m from PinupGlam. Thanks for everyone’s comments in here. It’s always nice to get feedback from people. It really helps us make the site better all around. If any of you ever have suggestions or comments or constructive criticism on how to improve things with the site, we’d love to hear it. You can always email us at webmaster@pinupglam.com or webmaster@pinupfiles.com
Two things real quick:
1) Regarding the HD on our sites not being “true HD” there’s really no such thing on the web at all as “true HD” because the video always has to be compressed. Uncompressed HD video digitized right out of the camera is about 1 GB per minute of file size. Given that our videos are 5 – 10 minutes each, that means that the download would be 5 to 10 gigabytes and that’s obviously not workable for anyone.
Yes, the lines of resolution are technically the measure of an HD signal, but that’s in the TV world, not on the web. On the web, because all video has to be compressed, the bigger factor in regards to video quality is the underlying data rate of the video file itself. Videos that are encoded with higher data rates look better, while videos that are recorded with lower ones look worse. It doesn’t matter if you have a 1920 x 1080 screen size if your data rate sucks — all you’ll get is a bunch of pixilated and blocky footage. As you know, the larger the size of an image, the higher it’s quality must be lest you get pixilation and degradation of the image. For us to properly sustain a 1920 x 1080 sized video image, the data rate would have to be about size times what is is right now for the quality to be comparable to what we have when we have a screen that’s about half that size. That means a download of around 800 MB to 1 GB per video, since ours are around 7 – 10 minutes long each, and that’s also really not workable.
We’ve also found that full-screen HD videos often don’t run smoothly and cause system slowdowns and have blocky/chunky playback. Not everyone has a screaming fast 3 Ghz quad core computer on which to view videos.
Not to mention, a 1920 x 1080 screen doesn’t even fit on most people’s computer monitors these days (you have to own a 30 inch HD monitor, like the $1800 version that Apple makes) in order to properly view it, and the vast majority of people don’t have that. Thus we shrink the video screen size to about half of full-size HD and use a very high data rate along with it and we feel it really looks nice with a good sized screen view.
If HD purists and videophiles want to take issue with this that’s fine but what they are asking for isn’t really practical or workable in the real world (at least right now) No doubt some day we will all have mega-fast broadband and HD monitors on nearly every personal computer across the world, but that day is not now, so we have to do the best we can with what we’ve got.
2) As for Rachel being “dull” I hear what you are saying but keep in mind these videos were done on her very first go around of being topless on camera. She was, as you can imagine, extremely nervous and shy and it did take quite a bit of coaching and help to get her to come out of her shell. In fact, the very first day she hyperventilated and nearly passed out because of her nerves. She has gotten better and better at it progressively and continues to work at it and has gotten much better and more comfortable over time. I guess what I’m saying is cut the girl a little slack and give her a break. This naked modeling stuff isn’t as easy as it may seem. :-)
Thanks.
David, she’s beautiful. She’s got no reason to be afraid :)
The reason they cover up quickly is to protect their earnings. If they over expose themselves it reduces the value of their pictures. I agree the tattoo was a mistake and think it spoils what would be otherwise a very natural body. I think we may have to accept she could be a chav.
Her tits are absolutely lovely!lolzas!if i wasnt a homosexual boy id bang her ! Omg! Im so naughty! Hahax