Apparently, there’s been a debate raging at PinUpGlam over the accuracy of Rachel Aldana‘s bra-size as cited on the site. Always ones willing to take their members up on a challenge (like when they proved Jana Defi was all natural using a sonogram some time back), they got out the measuring tape and put Rachel’s almost unbelievably huge breasts to the test with 36F Jelena Jensen on hand to tell the tale of the tape.
Now I know I’ve mentioned this once or twice in my responses to comments before, but I’ll reiterate: In terms of our “F-cup & Up” credo, MyBoobSite adheres strictly to the EN 13402 European Standard for bra-sizing which calculates cup-size based upon the differential between one’s under-bust girth and their “breast prominence” (I do so like that term, even though it’s just a fancy way of saying “bust-line”).
Thus, I figured it might be fun today to get to the bottom of Rachel’s cup-size conundrum by comparing her measurements to our established standard using these handy high-definition vidcaps from her most recent video posted at PinUpGlam.com as a reference…
…so, as these two vidcaps show, Rachel has an under-bust measurement of 30 inches (~76cm) and her bust-line (or shall I say breast prominence?) measures 41.5 inches (~105.5cm). Based upon our EN 13402 Standard, she’d fall right near the cusp between a J-cup and a K-cup (since most brassiere manufacturers skip the I-cup altogether and move straight on to J). Thus, I’d probably put her in a 75J or 75K bra, so the 30K bra-size she’s cited as having in these videos is totally reasonable when we convert the centimetres to imperial units.
However, plugging Rachel’s breast stats into several of the rubbish on-line bra-sizing calculators, I obtained results ranging from a 34FF to a 34H! However os a woman supposed to determine their correct bra size with any accuracy? And calculating it manually using the old system of adding four or five inches to the under-bust measure (depending upon whether the result is even or odd, respectively) to determine band-size and then using the differential between that and the bust-line for cup-size would just result in a baggy bra with too small a cup. No wonder statistics have shown that over 80% of women are wearing the wrong bra size!
I do so wish that all of MyBoobSite’s models would provide such detailed breast measurements as Ms. Aldana has so conscientiously done. Most of the big boob measuring videos I’ve seen just give the bust-line. If I had both of these measurements, I could put all of the cup-size debates that have cropped up here to rest once and for all! [Thus, if any girls out there would like to provide me with pics of their tits being measured in the same manner as the two examples above (or you can just do it yourself, if you like), I’d be happy to include you in the permanent EN 13402 reference page I’m going to post explaining MyBoobSite’s standards! ;~)]
But back to the video, although Rachel & Jelena went through all sorts of superfluous measurements well beyond what’s needed simply to determine her bra size (such as measuring Rachel’s areolas (which are 5cm (~2in), btw) and then becoming confused over the conversion between metric & imperial), I’ve decided to focus upon the two bits that count in today’s video clips. Thus, here’s formerly 32K Rachel Aldana measuring her breasts with the assistance of 36F Jelena Jensen courtesy of PinUpGlam.com:
[Special Offer: If you sign up as a member to PinUpGlam.com, you can get a membership in the other site upon which Rachel appears – PinUpFiles.com – for only $10- more! Check out the joint membership option on their join page for further information on registering for this 25% multi-site discount.]
Thank You Rachel!
Tony
They should have choose a man for this, it would be more sensual.
This girl is a true sensation. The sexiest woman in the world
Not to take away from the enormity of the issue at hand, excuse the pun, but as far as bra sizing goes, I thought the differential between the bust-line and the under-bust was divided by two when determining cup size.
Ideally, each breast is the same size as the other, and with cup sizes equaling about an inch further from the chest, it’s an addition of 2 inches (one from each side/breast) for an A-cup, 4 for a B etc.
That would put her right at about an F, at a 11.5 inch (6 inch-ish per breast) differential.
Or am I wrong? If so, I don’t know that I’ll ever understand bras.
I absolutely loved it when Jelena said “Okay, top off.” When I heard that it made me imagine myself reaching out and squeezing Rachel’s soft boobs.
Rachel isn’t the mascot for not reason! She is amazing, those breasts are just tip top! Slim ‘n’ stacked rules!
I have to say it again… Rachel is perfect. The hottest chick ever featured on this site, or any other (Welllll… Faith is in there too…).
Rachel is 30K perfection. She is still our 30JJGC super-kitten!
I’m all for a standardised system for bra-sizing. My wife has explained how she has to add 4-5 inches to her underbust measurement to get her correct band size, before she even starts on determining her current cup size. It all sounds terribly complicated. She reckons that the best way of doing it is to get professionally measured while shopping.
I have been to lingerie shops with her, where she has selected a range of bras to try on. Een after determining her current size, it’s amazing how much variation there is in sizing, not only between brands but even between styles of the same brand.
Over the years I have given up buying her sexy lingerie. The sizing issue is just too random to get it right. Still, it’s more fun shopping together anyway!
Hmm, something is amiss in the math here. It is fortunate in one aspect, for I’d rather Reese be the accomplished hooter hunter he is than a math wizard!
According to the Wikipedia page referenced in the blog and using the current standard cup size method used in Europe, Canada and the US:
30 + 4 = 34.
41.5 – 34 = 7.5.
The chart indicates a cup size of G or H. Summing it up, 34G or 34H, which is the method most of us are familiar with.
According to the UK/Australia scheme, 34F or 34FF.
Moving on to the new fangled system: 2.54cm/inch, 30X2.54 = 76.2 and 41.5X2.54 = 105.4
105.4 – 76.2 = 29.2, falling squarely in the middle of 28-30 range. The EN 13402 Standard chart stops at G, so we are left to extrapolation, which indicates an I cup or J cup, depending whether the chart skips the I. Since there are no DD, FF, or GG cups as in the current UK/Australia chart, the EN 13402 appears to follow the alphabet. Rounding 76.2 to the nearest multiple of 5 gives us 75. From the above, the bra size is 75I, a size that gives no immediate indication of size to many. Telling us the size is 34H is something I can wrap my mind around (and I wish my hands)!
Ssendam~
My university degree, which I’d unfortunately only finished to the Masters level, is in Computer Sciences with a minor in Maths.
Based upon the metric measures I’d discerned from Rachel’s video, these being an under-bust girth of 76cm and a bust-line girth of 105.5cm (and, no, I did not convert from Imperial units), I arrived at a cup-size differential of 29.5cm.
Extrapolating the EN 13402 table with the full consideration that most European bra manufacturers dispense with the I-cup designation entirely – thus placing the H-cup at 26-28cm, the J-cup at 28-30cm and the K-cup at 30-32cm – the 29.5cm differential fell remarkably close to the cusp between a J- & K-cup (as stated in the blog, albeit with unspoken consideration of the breast-enlarging impact that menstruation can have depending upon what point within Rachel’s cycle this video was shot).
Thus, I stick by my estimation of putting Rachel in a 75J or 75K bra, which would render the video’s assertion of 30K entirely within reason.
Cheers,
~Reese! :~)
Anybody else note that they break the main rule of bra measurement by performing it without a bra on.
Not that I’m complaining. but having the bra on usually adds somewhat to the over bust measurement (I believe this was noted before in another blog about measuring) and so the I/J arrived at in EN 13402 may be under the appropriate number. Of course Rachel doesn’t look like she needs a bra that much.
jelena’s tits look like c-cups when beside rachel’s tits
Gosh I love those little rolls of fat that Rachel Aldana has!! God they are so sexy!!
MMMMM kiss kiss kiss. Wouldn’t want her any thinner. Love those nice big titties, perfect tummy, nice little rolls oh yum. Definitely would love to screw her. In the ass, between her titties, in her pussy cum all over her face. Definitely. Would love to see her breastfeed that’s for sure. Would love to see all these big boob models breastfeed their kids that’s for sure. Wow.
i wish the EU standard would actually be implemented.
They’re sort of breaking the main measuring rule by not having Rachel in a bra… but that right there is one thing (of many) that has always driven me NUTS about bra sizing.
“Wearing your best-fitting bra…”
I’ve got a novel idea. If you have a bra that fits you well, take it off. Look at the tag. Buy another one.
Those of us who DON’T have a bra that fits us well because we can’t find one because we don’t know our size?
Screwed!!!
I just took a field trip to the UK and went to both Rigby & Peller AND Bravissimo. R&P had NOTHING IN THE STORE that would fit me! Bravissimo simply stepped me up a back size and down a cup size and cheerfully tried to sell me fifty bras that still didn’t fit.
There’s no SCIENCE in it. This offends me mightily.
(The worst part of all of it is that I remain convinced that my boobs aren’t really that big. But if Rachel is really a 30K… I’m a 32J… that means theoretically our boobs are the same size. I don’t look ANYTHING like her!!! Which is why she’s making a living off hers and I’m not!!!)
Recently hooked up with a girl with boobs, you won´t belive me ofc but bigger and even better looking than beutiful Rachel here. Her biggest bra is 75k but at certain times of the month it is not big enough and she bulges out good..
But she is having a reduction. Buhu. It´s a cruel world.